First, let’s classify the definition of “fail.” I’ll refer to an analysis conducted by the Deloitte Review. They looked at 400 M&A transactions in an attempt to determine how successful the transaction had been. heir findings revealed:
• 27% of the deals were classified as high-performing growth (acquirers able to consistently grow the combined businesses faster than the separate companies)
• 45% were medium-performing growth (acquirers able to grow the business, but inconsistently or at a slower rate than prior to the M&A)
• 28% were low-performing growth deals (acquirers could only produce flat or declining revenues)
The Deloitte Review pieces warrants a read and offers up some key suggestions regarding a successful M&A, so check it out, but I’d like to share the critical characteristics needed to break that 27% mark:
1. Ensure it’s a win-win situation for both parties. This is not a winner-take-all transaction. An M&A should be designed for the long-term strategic benefit of both parties. Design it any other way and you’re destined for failure.
2. Plan for the M&A thoroughly. Many companies rush into these types of transactions – most primarily do it to save a sinking ship. An M&A is not a quick fix. Approach it that way, and you’ll soon have a disaster on your hands.
3. Build in a transition team. A transition team is critical for an M&A to work, as it will help ensure the successful transition before, during and after the deal closes. Not only that, but it allows you to focus on keeping your business strong during the 18-24 months it takes for a typical close.
4. Put a contingency plan in place. It’s not uncommon for an M&A to fall apart during the negotiations. Do you have a Plan B in place? And what happens with issues after the close? Make sure you’ve covered all the bases.
There are a multitude of other critical strategies essential for the successful M&A to occur. The four tactics I’ve listed here should top your list if you plan on making M&As a part of your long-term strategic growth.
*The numbers are not specific to label and narrow web, and were conducted from 2001 - 2007, but the trending by and large is consistent throughout the financial marketplace.

