• Login
    • Join
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Exclusives
    • Labels & Packaging
    • Markets
    • Technology
    • Equipment
    • Supplies
    • Buyers' Guide
    • Events
    • Jobs
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Exclusives
  • Labels & Packaging
  • Markets
  • Technology
  • Equipment
  • Supplies
  • Buyers' Guide
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Columns
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Dscoop Post-Show Coverage

    Slitter-Rewinders

    Craft Beer Labels

    Pharmaceutical Labels

    Luminer Converting Group: Narrow Web Profile
    Breaking News
    Converter News
    European Label News
    Industry News
    Industry People
    M&A News
    New Products
    Expert's Opinion
    Live From Shows
    Top News
    Brook + Whittle's new acquisition, SunDance goes to HP and more

    Specialty announces move to new facility

    Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw

    Nazdar celebrates 100th anniversary with refreshed brand identity

    Kingfisher Labels adds 10th Edale press
    Blog
    Video Bites
    Beauty & Personal Care Labels
    Beer Labels
    Beverage Labels
    Flexible Packaging
    Folding Carton
    Food Labels
    Glue-Applied
    In-Mold
    Industrial Labels
    Medical Labels
    Pharmaceutical Labels
    Pressure Sensitive
    Prime Labels
    Promotional Labels
    Security Labels
    Shrink
    Smart Labels
    Specialty Labels
    Spirits Labels
    Wine Labels

    Brook + Whittle's new acquisition, SunDance goes to HP and more

    World’s first tequila in a cardboard bottle

    In-Mold Decorating Association announces 2022 IMDA Awards Competition

    Five approaches for more sustainable beauty packaging

    Essentra Packaging invests in Landa Nanographic press
    Africa
    Asia
    Australia
    China
    Europe
    India
    Latin America
    Middle East
    North America

    Specialty announces move to new facility

    Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw

    Kingfisher Labels adds 10th Edale press

    Dantex Group receives accreditation for Pico digital presses

    Heidelberg USA launches new Print Media Performance & Training Center
    Flexography
    Digital Printing
    Prepress
    Finishing
    Sustainability

    Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw

    Kingfisher Labels adds 10th Edale press

    Dantex Group receives accreditation for Pico digital presses

    World’s first tequila in a cardboard bottle

    EyeC unveils revamped website
    Digital Printers & Presses
    Flexo Presses
    Label Converting Equipment
    Label Finishing Equipment
    Prepress Equipment

    Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw

    Kingfisher Labels adds 10th Edale press

    Dantex Group receives accreditation for Pico digital presses

    EyeC unveils revamped website

    Essentra Packaging invests in Landa Nanographic press
    Dies And Tooling
    Flexo Supplies
    Ink & Coatings
    Prepress Supplies
    Pressrooom Supplies
    Substrates

    Nazdar celebrates 100th anniversary with refreshed brand identity

    Avery Dennison announces Global Supplier Award winners

    In 2040 a fifth of all food packaging could still be landfilled or incinerated

    Nazdar to manufacture VFP electronic ink for US Market

    Asda implements latest ColorCert ScoreCard Server
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Profiles
    Label Converters
    Trade Associations
    Add New Company
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    Meech International

    Heidelberg USA

    Ashe Converting Equipment

    Spinnaker Coating, LLC

    Epson America, Inc.
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live from Show Events
    • Magazine
      • Current & Past Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Edition
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • Breaking News
    • Buyers' Guide
      • All Companies
      • Categories
      • Company Profiles
      • Label Converters
      • Trade Associations
      • Add Your Company
    • Labels & Packaging
      • Beauty & Personal Care Labels
      • Beer Labels
      • Beverage Labels
      • Flexible Packaging
      • Folding Carton
      • Food Labels
      • Glue-Applied
      • In-Mold
      • Industrial Labels
      • Medical Labels
      • Pharmaceuticals Labels
      • Pressure Sensitive
      • Prime Labels
      • Promotional Labels
      • Security Labels
      • Shrink
      • Smart Labels
      • Speciality Labels
      • Spirits Labels
      • Wine Tables
    • Markets
      • Africa
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • Latin America
      • Middle East
      • North America
    • Equipment
      • Digital Printers & Presses
      • Flexo Presses
      • Label Converting Equipment
      • Label Fishing Equipment
    • Supplies
      • Dies And Tooling
      • Flexo Supplies
      • Ink & Coatings
      • Prepress Supplies
      • Substrates
      • Pressrooom Supplies
    • Online Exclusives
    • Slideshows
    • Experts Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Blog
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live from Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Jobs
    • Resources
      • Supplier Gallery
      • Literature Showcase
      • Homepage Showcase
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise With Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Features

    Using Simulation to Decide on Digital

    Modeling a digital print run may reduce the uneasiness associated with contemplating a large investment.

    Chris Lynn11.17.14
    As the last Labelexpo exhibition clearly showed, digital printing and converting is becoming mainstream in the label industry. Different technologies and configurations are on offer which can be broadly classified as electrophotographic (toner-based) printing, or UV-curable or water-based inkjet printing. The products range from $20,000 desktop-type printers to $2 million integrated systems with laser diecutting, and “hybrid” machines that mix digital and analog print technologies.

    This much will be familiar to regular readers of L&NW, which has been reporting on digital print adoption for many years. Yet the market penetration of digital printers – about 1,700 units, mainly HP Indigos – is still limited. And the production of digitally printed PS labels remains small – about 2.4% by printed area, according to I.T. Strategies. So most small- to mid-sized label converters have not yet made the leap into the new technology. 

    Why is this? For many, the reasons are the usual concerns about new technology: is it reliable? Can I get support? Will it be superseded by newer technology before I get a return on investment? And so on. For some, concerns about print quality – mostly misplaced – predominate. But for the majority of printers who are not early adopters, the hesitation is based on economics. They ask themselves:

    Should I be making a major investment of any kind, given the economy, my target market’s dynamics and my strategy?

    Should my investment be in new digital printing technology or something else entirely – other equipment, upgrades to current capabilities, different initiatives?

    If I invest in digital printing equipment:
    a. What’s my break-even run-length, compared to flexo?
    b. What does my new ability to address short run or variable data or fast turnaround jobs mean for my current and potential new customers?
    c. What premium can I get, if any, for these new offerings?
    d. How do I need to organize my business to handle a higher volume of smaller orders?
    e. What does this do to my competitiveness?

    In my experience, owners and managers who are considering investments in digital technology and have got past the first two questions spend far too much time analyzing and agonizing over question 3a, and not nearly enough time on b, c, d and e. This is certainly understandable – a break-even calculation is based on readily-quantifiable costs: plates, labor, setup time, waste, ink, etc; whereas potential new markets, customers or other revenue sources are much harder to estimate, and may be dismissed by the hard-nosed accountant as pie-in-the-sky, especially when (s)he realizes that the average order value may actually go down as the runs get shorter.

    This is where software simulation can help. For many of us, a “simulator” is one of those machines at theme parks where an immersive and stomach-churning experience is created with widescreen video and hydraulic rams moving under computer control. Or perhaps we think of the venerable Microsoft Flight Simulator, now one of the oldest PC video games still in use. Manufacturing process simulation or “discrete event” simulation is perhaps less exciting than either of these, but it may actually reduce the stomach-churning induced by contemplating a big investment. How? By allowing a user to model the effect of the investment on a PC before actually making it. A good model might allow you to envision the effect on productivity, profitability or delivery time of an investment in capital equipment, people or other resources. It lets you play with variables like the number of operators on a shift, the rate at which new orders arrive and their size, and the time taken for each step in a process. It will show you bottlenecks and let you see the effect of different assumptions on throughput. Simulation is a great tool for companies pursuing Lean Manufacturing, as proposed by many articles in this periodical over the years.

    A Simulation Example
    What follows is taken from a simulation I created for my client Prototype & Production Systems, Inc., makers of the DICEweb  inkjet add-on for a flexo press. To avoid giving the impression that this is a sales pitch, let me mention that other “hybrid” print solutions, mixing inkjet and flexo production in a single production line with converting, include the new Mark Andy Digital Series, the Fujifilm/FFEI Graphium, and the Colordyne Flexo-bility. With the appropriate assumptions for cost and profitability, the simulation could apply to any of these.

    The simulation sets up three parallel workflows, with print jobs entering all three simultaneously:


    Fig. 1 – The simulation screen
    A conventional flexo workflow: after job preparation, the work packet either goes to plate making or bypasses this if the plates already exist. The user decides what proportion of jobs need new plates. The work then moves on-press with plate and die setup and makeready, printing, diecutting and clean-up. Diecutting is inline so it takes no additional time, but the press is blocked from accepting another job until clean-up is completed for the previous one.

    A standalone digital system workflow: after a brief setup, the digital printer runs a batch of jobs that use the same die; the roll is moved to a separate diecutter (which requires some set-up time, but which can run in parallel with the printer’s next job), and the finished roll is removed.

    A hybrid workflow: after a brief setup for the print job and the inline die station, the digital printer prints and the job is diecut “on-the-fly” with no roll change.

    Figure 1 shows the simulation screen: jobs enter on the left side at a user-selectable average daily rate and are processed through each of the workflows. The flexo process steps are in green, the standalone digital in yellow, and the hybrid in pink. At the top of the screen are the resources available: the capital equipment and the operators. There are also two buttons that bring up tables into which the process assumptions can be entered: the time taken to make plates and to set up equipment, the run speeds, hourly costs, etc. At the bottom right is a table summarizing the results for the simulation run, and a bar chart showing the relative profitability of the three workflows for each run.

    The small rectangles, some of which are partially filled in red, are queues; the red indicates how many jobs are waiting because of a bottleneck further downstream. The processes light up in orange when they are active.

    In the run shown, the assumptions included an average run-length of 2,500 feet with five 4-color jobs at a time being ganged on the same die. With the assumptions used, the standalone system completed 82% more jobs than the flexo press, and the hybrid 148% more, in both cases with significant savings in materials, and greater profitability.

    This model is grossly simplified, compared to a real plant – there is only one of each piece of equipment and one operator for each; the simulation is run for four weeks, with one eight hour shift, five days a week. Of course, more complex configurations shift patterns can also be modeled.

    The system is capable of generating other useful reports, such as the utilization rate of the assets. The simulation allows users to play with different “what if” scenarios. For example:

    What if the run speed of the digital printer were only 50% of the flexo press and offline diecutter?

    What if the hourly costs of the different printing systems were different?

    What if the cost of digital ink (or a click charge) changed?

    How does the volume of completed jobs change if every job needs new plates and dies?

    What is the effect of doubling (or halving) the number of jobs my sales force brings in per day?

    How does average run-length affect productivity and profitability? (In other words, the answer to the hesitant buyer’s question on break-even mentioned above…)


    Fig. 2 – Relative costs for 3 printing methods
    Because the simulator can run through a month’s production in seconds, and it can apply a random element to many of the variables it uses, it is possible to run dozens of experiments with different assumptions, and to export the results to create graphs that provide insights into the behavior of the different workflows under different conditions. For example, Figure 2 shows the total cost per thousand feet for each of the three workflows for different run-length jobs:

    These costs include the operating costs of the respective machines, plus consumables. As you can see, using the assumptions that were entered into the simulation model, the break-even on cost between flexo and digital occurs between 4,000-10,000 feet, depending on whether the digital technology is standalone or hybrid.

    Figures 3 & 4 show some relative profitability comparisons in

    Fig. 3 – Relative profitability at 5 new jobs/day
    terms of gross profit (or, more accurately, contribution margin) over the 4-week simulation time. The difference between the two graphs is instructive – the first assumes five new jobs entered per day, and the second assumes ten new jobs per day.

    Let’s examine what is happening here: for short-run jobs, fewer jobs mean less profit in all cases. For long-run jobs, production bottlenecks limit the possible profit; you can see that, for 80,000 ft. jobs, the maximum profit for each workflow is the same whether five or ten new jobs are coming in per day. It is in the middle ground that stark differences in profitability emerge when ten or more new jobs/day come in. Both standalone and hybrid digital systems do better than flexo for the shortest runs, but the stand-alone system drops off more quickly than the hybrid. This is mainly because the simulation is set up with assumed speeds of 200 fpm for flexo, 160 fpm for hybrid, and only 120 fpm for the standalone digital system. But the fact that the standalone system requires the printed roll to be removed to a separate diecutting machine also hurts productivity.

    Fig. 4 - Relative profitability at 10 new jobs/day

    So, in this model, the break-even point for standalone is at about 5,000 feet for both five and ten jobs/day joining the input queue; whereas, given plenty of new jobs, the hybrid system remains the most profitable option until run-lengths reach about 15,000 feet. As the runs get longer, of course, the greater speed of the flexo press, and the greater cost of digital ink (or click charges) negatively affect both digital systems.

    Conclusions
    The statistician George Box wrote that “All models are wrong, but some are useful.” Plant simulation models are no exception – they contain plenty of over-simplifications and the assumptions used in them can always be questioned. But I would argue that, for any manufacturer of products, they can provide actionable insights when used with care.

    In the case of the simple label manufacturing example I have discussed here, one lesson is that, to get a good return on a digital system, you must “feed the beast.” If you have made an investment in an asset that excels at doing short-run work as opposed to other work, you’d better have plenty of short-run work coming in – and you’d better avoid bottlenecks upstream in pre-flighting or other operations that might limit throughput to the digital system. Another lesson is that, in most circumstances, ganging jobs on the same die and diecutting inline with printing (provided it does not slow the entire process) is more efficient than running printing and diecutting separately. You might say that these conclusions are pretty obvious, but simulation allows you to quantify the effects of different variables – run speed, labor rates, cost of digital ink, etc – and make judgments on what factors are most important to your business.

    I hope I have shown that plant simulation software can be a useful tool in analyzing new investments in production technology. A final suggestion: enterprise value can be grown by saving manufacturing costs, but this leads to an analysis of potential digital investments that is too narrow. Value and competitive advantage are mainly created by growing revenues with new products and services, entering new markets and building brands. Digital printing technologies can help to do all these things, and scenario modeling can help to evaluate the digital options. But in the end, the boldness and good judgment of the entrepreneur will determine who wins.


    Chris Lynn is a principal of Hillam Technology Partners LLC, an Atlanta-based consultancy providing marketing and business development services to graphics technology businesses. He can be reached at chris@hillamtech.com.
    Related Searches
    • Label industry
    • Lean Manufacturing
    • Digital printing
    • Variable data

    Related Content


      Trending
      • Specialty Announces Move To New Facility | Label and Narrow Web
      • Specialty announces move to new facility
      • The Progression Of Paper Mills | Label and Narrow Web
      • Avery Dennison Announces Global Supplier Award Winners | Label and Narrow Web
      • Brook + Whittle Acquires Diamond Flexible Packaging | Label and Narrow Web
      Breaking News
      • Brook + Whittle's new acquisition, SunDance goes to HP and more
      • Specialty announces move to new facility
      • Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw
      • Nazdar celebrates 100th anniversary with refreshed brand identity
      • Kingfisher Labels adds 10th Edale press
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      April 2022

      • Dscoop Post-Show Coverage
      • Slitter-Rewinders
      • Craft Beer Labels
      • Pharmaceutical Labels
      • Luminer Converting Group

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      GOED Creates Infographic Highlighting Omega-3 Health Claims Approved in Europe
      Kyowa Hakko Appoints Dr. Colin Hill to Immuse Scientific Advisory Board
      Expert Consensus Statement: Diet is Best Primary Intervention to Achieve Diabetes Remission
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      What Are You Reading?
      Teknos Receives EcoVadis Gold Medal for Sustainability Performance
      AkzoNobel and Partners Team Up to Hack Carbon Reduction Challenges
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      MPO's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 21
      Iterative Scopes Expands its Senior Leadership Team
      Viz.ai Raises $100 Million in Series D Funding
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      Piramal Pharma Solutions New API Plant in Canada Now Online
      MG America Appoints Claudio Radossi as President
      Catalent Invests $175M to Expand Mfg. Capabilities at Winchester, KY
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      Authentic Beauty Concept Launches Second-Generation ‘Refill Bar’
      HASK Beauty Enters Exclusive Partnership with Amazon
      Garance Doré Launches Made in France Skincare Line
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      SPF Setting Spray, Lip Contour and Knotless Braids Are Hot Trends: Spate
      Nutrafol Launches Collagen Infusion
      ÄZ Craft Luxury Haircare Products Support All Hairstyles
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      Weekly Recap: Zeller+Gmelin, Sun Chemical and Kornit Top This Week’s News
      Nazdar Celebrates 100 Years with a New Look
      hubergroup Chemicals Exhibits at Paint India for First Time
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      Brook + Whittle's new acquisition, SunDance goes to HP and more
      Specialty announces move to new facility
      Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      3M to Expand in Nebraska
      Nicely Offers Nonwoven Slitters, Winders
      'Right' Hygiene Conference to be Held in June
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      ODT's Most Read Stories This Week—May 21
      FDA Clears Anika Therapeutics' X-Twist Knotless Fixation System
      Paragon 28 Rolls Out TenoTac 2.0 Hammertoe and Soft Tissue Repair
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      Weekly Recap: Graphene Flagship, Japan Display and LG Display Top This Week’s Stories
      Evonik Launches New Processing Aids for PV Wafer Cutting
      NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell

      Copyright © 2022 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login